Stem Cell Breast Fat Transplant
Scientifically increased survival rate - LaPrin’s EasyStemCell system
Scientifically increased survival rate - LaPrin’s EasyStemCell system
Latest breast augmentation technique to increase engraftment
and reduce side effects of common breast transplants
LaPrin highly recommends breast fat transplant to those who are currently reluctant to undergo
breast transplant surgery due to low engraftment rates.
It is because we built confidence based on scientific data to prove increased rate of engraftment.
Low risk of capsular contracture
The most frightening complications of breast transplant is oil cyst due to necrosis of injected fat.
This is most common in fat injection method that injects a large amount of fat into a single place.
Depending on the literature, oil cyst is usually found in 15 to 20% of breast fat transplant cases.
Breast fat transplant requires special care by a surgeon injecting fat for the patient's long-term health.
Oil cysts are seen over a long period of time and can lead to chronic chest pain along with calcification during progression.
In addition, these pain and cyst sizes do not disappear naturally and cause various chronic problems.
LaPrin developed space expansion vibrating injection method to solve such problems.
Two types of LaPrin’s
breast fat transplant technique to dramatically
Increase the breast volume + excess fat removal
3 months after the surgery
3D Vectra analysis show an increase of
140.7cc on the left and 100.4cc on the right side
SVF (fat derived cell) breast augmentation is normally observed over 9 months in average.
For this patient, 30% more fat regrowth is possible over the next 6 months.
Most outstanding device in Korea,
LaPrin’s EasyStemCell System
It is possible to conduct safe and effective surgery
with quick extraction in 15 minutes using advanced equipment by
professional researcher within the hospital for complete one-stop treatment.
World-standard, advanced cryopreservation system Cell Bank System
LaPrin’s cryopreservation system is operated in the same way as the laboratories
and university hospitals that functions as cells, tissues,
and umbilical cord blood banks for the treatment of incurable diseases.
Cell Counting System
Number of stem cells cannot be identified with the human eye.
LaPrin provides service to allow patients to verify the effective
cell count using medical device that indicates numerical value for healthy
stem cells before storing it.
Aseptic Clean Room Safety System
The subfacial breast augmentation is the most recent breast reconstruction method developed by Dr. Ruth Graf,
the head of the Brazilian Breast Surgery, in 2004. It is the latest method of breast surgery that
utilizes both the advantages of submammary implantation and intramusclar implantation.
It basically inserts the implant above the breast muscles and between the fascia, tissue that stabilizes
and separate surrounding muscles, and muscular fat tissue.
It requires highly skillful surgeons to perform the delicate and
complex fascia separation compared to conventional methods used in other hospitals.
Conventional intramuscular implantation has a shorter operation time compared to subfascial implantation but,
while there may be some variance between hospitals,
there are cases where the separation is performed with a simple blunt (dull) dissection.
It is patient friendly technique. In the case of the usual intramuscular insertion method,
resection the lower part of the breast muscle was inevitably for muscle separation. Not only that,
for 1 to 2 weeks after surgery, sternum (rib) under the breast muscles will be inflamed,
accompanied by pain due to surgical hemorrhaging and damaging from surgical instruments which are the two most common causes of severe pain This results in a long recovery period and discomfort.
Subfascial implantation does not require a surgical procedure that causes these two pains,
resulting in only a mild discomfort similar to muscle aches after straining exercise and a short recovery period.
Furthermore, overall breast shape is very natural and
good surgical results are obtained even for moderate to severely sagging breast
For those who have very poor or thin breast tissues, we use the intramuscular implantation method (double plane method).
However, we do not recommend intramuscular implantation for those who are suitable for subfascial implantation
Assuming that the surgery went well without any complications, no inflammation/hemorrhage/tissue damage,
body reacts to the inserted implant by surrounding it with bio-film (a kind of scar tissue).
Typical silicone or smoothed implants causes bio-film to form fibrous tissues (hard and tough).
And the thicker the fibrous tissue are, harder and more rigid the breast becomes.
Amount of fibrous film formation determines the texture of the breast implant.
Microthane implants made up of polyurethane coating prevents fibrous film formation around the
implant compared to silicone or smoothed implants.
This completely different kind of film formation is witnessed via the result of a very soft breast.
In general, breast augmentation by intramuscular implantation may cause complications such as the rotation
of the water drop implants due to the movement of the muscles and shifting of the implant position to up, down,
or lower side due to the contraction of the muscle.
This can result in unnatural breast shape and hence they recommend patients to
limit the muscle movement until the implant is fully anchored.
In contrast, subfascial implantation is not affected by the muscles movement during the exercise,
so you can move your arms freely after the surgery.
Our body feels pain thru sensory nerves. Post-operative pain is caused by inflamed tissues during
it’s healing process in the first week of the surgery
Generally the intensity of pain tends to be greater when it comes from the internal organs and
pain from inflammation is least severe. In the case of breast surgery by intramusclar implantation,
inflammation of the sternum (rib) underneath the muscle is inevitable and the resulting pain may be similar to a rib fracture.
Our subfascial implantation does not cause inflammation of the sternum,
resulting in only a mild discomfort similar to muscle aches after exercising.
After the breast surgery, most common cause for unnatural or deformed shape is due to capsular contracture or
rotation and shifting of the implant. Also, it is possible that appropriate shape and
size of the implant was not selected for the individual. Conversely, if you do not have any of these side effects,
you can have a natural looking breast.
All three implants are silicone-based, and the tissue reaction is similar when inserted into our body.
Overall shape and texture of the breast after surgery depends on the
formation of a fibrous tissue around the silicone textured implant.
For silicone-textured implants, the rate of occurrence of capsular contracture is similar and
occurrence rate of grade 2 or higher is usually about 15-20%. In addition,
research papers show that re-operation due to cosmetic reasons varies from
35 to 40% within 10 years after surgery with some variance.
The microthane breast implant is completely different from the conventional silicone-based breast implant,
resulting in a significantly lower rate of capsular contracture. According to the survey,
although there are slight differences, only 1-3% is reported to have suffered from capsular contracture.
From October, 2017 to January, 2019, we conducted a survey on 150 patients who underwent microthane subfascial breast augmentation.
We found more than 90% of patients were very satisfied with the outcome in terms of breast shape and size.
There was no case of grade 2 or higher capsular contracture occurrence or deformity due to implant rotation.
Among the 150 patients, 65 patients who used different types of implant had
reoperation due occurrence of capsular contracture, implant rupture, or shifted position from their first.
These 65 patients had re-operation using microthane implant in various sizes ranging from 240 to 390cc, with average being 310cc.